<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Smoking ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catallaxy.net/2007/12/27/update-smoking-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catallaxy.net/2007/12/27/update-smoking-ban/</link>
	<description>Some civil servants are just like my loved ones.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Barney</title>
		<link>http://catallaxy.net/2007/12/27/update-smoking-ban/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Barney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catallaxy.net/2007/12/27/update-smoking-ban/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>You know, I have never understood the lack of outrage when government disallows otherwise legal activity on private property.  

I have heard the argument go this way:  Second hand smoke is a health hazard (I agree.)  Therefore, government should disallow smoking in public places.  

Here's the rub:  a private business establishment is not a public place--it is a private place into which the general public is allowed to enter.  It is not a courthouse or DMV or other government monopoly for which you would have no other alternative to conduct that particular business--so a reasonable argument can be made that it should be accessible to non-smokers as well.  

But for a tavern or whatnot, with the variety capitalism affords why not allow smoking bars?  

Think of it this way:  you can legally inhale the concentrated smoke directly from a cigarette but if you dare inhale it second hand it's a crime?  What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have never understood the lack of outrage when government disallows otherwise legal activity on private property.  </p>
<p>I have heard the argument go this way:  Second hand smoke is a health hazard (I agree.)  Therefore, government should disallow smoking in public places.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the rub:  a private business establishment is not a public place&#8211;it is a private place into which the general public is allowed to enter.  It is not a courthouse or DMV or other government monopoly for which you would have no other alternative to conduct that particular business&#8211;so a reasonable argument can be made that it should be accessible to non-smokers as well.  </p>
<p>But for a tavern or whatnot, with the variety capitalism affords why not allow smoking bars?  </p>
<p>Think of it this way:  you can legally inhale the concentrated smoke directly from a cigarette but if you dare inhale it second hand it&#8217;s a crime?  What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
